|
|

by John Carroll
I've recently come across
the term consent communication, one that I find
similar to permission marketing. From my perspective,
this is all about relationships, and relationships
are built on a base of trust and liking. If
I don't trust you, Im unlikely to open
up sufficiently with my needs and desires. Without
that opening, no relationship can take shape.
Similarly, if I don't like you, I'll resist
your attempts to have me respond to your communications.
If you continue in your attempts to communicate,
I may respond bluntly by asking you to remove
me from your contact list.
Once the basis of trust and
liking is assured, relationships must also hold
some present or future value to those in the
relationship. For example, the value to someone
in my providing an article as content for a
business publication or web site is that the
recipient gets valuable information from a credible
source. Because that publication or web site
wants to attract and keep readers or visitors,
my deliverable equates to value. In this example,
the value to me is that this publication or
web site and the company behind it have established
a brand or an online presence and, presumably,
will get the word out. Readers of the publication
or visitors drawn to the web site see my name
and can visit my web site or contact me directly.
This expands my territory, a key objective in
my ongoing marketing process.
Long-term relationships hinge
on lasting value. If you want long-term relationships,
how do you propose to offer and deliver lasting
value? Lets assume that I am your client
or customer. Ive decided to take some
time to speak with you and provide you with
valuable insights about me and what I value.
The value equation
Whether Im considering starting a new
relationship or deciding if Ill stick
with an existing one, the answer comes from
the value equation:
Value Price = Net Value
In this equation, Value is
my perceived value of our relationship to me.
Price is what Ill pay to get or keep that
value. Net Value is the difference between the
two. There are three possible answers to this
value equation: a positive difference, no difference
and a negative difference.
A positive difference is when
Net Value is above zero. In this case, chances
are good that Ill choose to enter into
or continue the relationship. I sense that I
continue to get more out of the relationship
than I must invest in it.
For example, as a professional speaker,
I value my membership in the National Speakers
Association. The Value I find in networking,
relevant and timely information and credibility
as a member of this organization exceeds the
Price, which is the annual membership fee.
The value equation yields no
difference when Net Value is zero. Here I can
go either way. I may decide that Ill take
my resources (time, money, effort and energy)
elsewhere, looking for a better return on the
price I pay. I may also decide that as long
as Im getting at least as much value as
the price Im investing in the relationship,
Ill stick with it.
Note that its always
easier for me to stay right where I am without
going through the pain of creating new relationships.
New relationships usually require energy, effort,
thought, time and money. Familiarity may, at
times, breed contempt. It also provides a source
of comfort in times characterized by rapid change.
I will tend to stay where I am and may require
good reasons for vacating my current position.
An example of zero Net Value
is the craftsperson who sees higher pay for
the same skilled position at a competitor and
considers the possibility of changing employers.
By thinking through the opportunity, he or she
realizes that a 50-cent per hour increase in
a work year yields a before-tax raise of $1,040,
based on working 52 40-hour weeks. By moving,
however, this craftsperson would forfeit seniority
with the current employer and lose a full week
of vacation for the first two years of employment.
Based on a $15 hourly wage, the week of vacation
pays a gross of $600. Taking two years of both
the pay increase and the lost vacation week,
the equation looks like this:
|
$2,080 (2 years of a 50-cent per
hour increase before taxes)
- $1,200 (2 weeks paid vacation
lost in the move)
$880 net value of the increase
$880
2 years = $440 per year net
increase before taxes
$440 per year net increase
2,080 work hours per year
= $0.21 per hour net increase before
taxes
|
With working conditions and
all other things perceived as being equal between
the two employers, this craftsperson chooses
to remain in the current situation. While the
relationship with the current employer is such
that the craftsperson is open to considering
new opportunities, the Net Value of the current
situation in comparison to the job offer is
too close to zero to justify making the change.
A negative difference in
the value equation results when the perception
of Value is lower than the Price to be paid.
This explains why it costs more and takes more
time to establish new relationships. Without
a track record to go on, Im likely to
consider the Value and Price of new relationships
and decide that Im better off with the
status quo. In selling to me, your challenge
is to build the perception of Value far beyond
the Price required. When Price gets lost in
the long shadow of perceived Value, it will
take some other circumstance to prevent the
sale from taking place and the new relationship
from forming.
For example, one of our
clients is a high-profile firm that specializes
in placing junior military officers with private
sector employers. When the founder/CEO considers
sales training opportunities for his team, he
regularly calculates fees based on their equivalent
in placements at an average dollar per placement
figure. The question he then asks himself is
simply, Would this investment generate
the number of incremental placements to more
than pay for itself in new revenues and resulting
net profit to the firm?
For the purpose of an example,
lets say that this clients average
revenue per placement is $10,000. Hell
make a $25,000 investment if and only if he
can comfortably predict that the return on that
investment will be at least five placements
he wouldnt have completed otherwise. If
hes uncertain that hell get even
three placements, his perceived Net Value is
a negative difference, costing him more than
hell receive as a return and hell
pass on the investment.
In an existing relationship,
a negative difference happens when, over time,
Im no longer happy with my perceived ongoing
Value of continuing in the relationship. I sense
that Im paying too high a Price for the
Value received and Ill choose to go through
the pain of discontinuing the relationship.
I may seek a replacement relationship or just
leave you and not pursue it any further.
Value is the key here. If
you can provide me with Value over the long
haul, and the Price I pay for that Value is,
in my eyes, less than the Value received, Ill
continue in the relationship. If, on the other
hand, the Price appears larger than Value received,
I may not act immediately, but over time Ill
begin to cool on the relationship. This is why,
when you make some offer that requires a commitment
on my part and the value equation has been a
negative number for a sufficient period of time,
you may be surprised when I decline the offer
without having given you any clear signals that
Ive become less than enamored with the
relationship.
Building value
So what exactly builds Value in
my eyes? Ideally, our relationship should be
strong enough for you to ask me. Or you should
be close enough to me in our relationship that
you can easily tell what represents Value for
me.
Value also comes in various
sizes. For example, you could take the lazy
way out when you generalize and hope that the
coffee mug imprinted with your logo represents
Value to me. In this case, you run the risk
of my getting so many such gifts through the
years that I automatically give them away or
send them straight to the corner with items
for the next garage sale. That may defeat your
purpose of having a reminder of your business
in my plain sight day after day.
Conversely, you could also
dig deeper and learn that I appreciate and value
a handwritten thank you note after I buy something
from you. In this case, I value the time youve
taken to write the note and feel that you consider
our relationship important.
Whether the Value added
is large or small, its critical that you
locate and uncover what Value means to me and
find ways to deliver that Value over the long
haul. That will register to me as a relationship
worth keeping, one which can withstand a few
mistakes along the way without my immediate
departure. Have enough deposits in that account,
as in Stephen Coveys emotional bank account,
and you can make a few withdrawals without risking
an overdraft situation.
The Value challenge
The opportunity or challenge you
face, then, in establishing or maintaining a
long-term relationship with me, your customer,
is to uncover what represents Value to me and
find ways to deliver that Value repeatedly.
Be ready for what I perceive as Value to change
periodically, because conditions and situations
change. If I feel I have plenty of what youre
continuing to deliver to me, the perception
of Value is diminished, as is my sense of your
knowing what I value here and now.
Ask me on a regular basis and in
various ways what I value and why. Read up on
what others in my industry value and why and
compare those findings to your conversations
with me. Anticipate changes in what I value
and confirm them with relevant questions. Help
me understand what I should value, based on
all youve learned, and I can then value
you as a trusted advisor to my personal and
professional advancement.
John Carroll is President/CEO
of Unlimited Performance, a Mt. Pleasant, SC,
firm focused on organizational and individual
performance improvement. He is the author of
Sales Illustrated 68 Sales
Lessons from Everyday Life. Contact
him at 1-877-755-8844 toll-free, email at
jcarroll@uperform.com,
fax at (843) 881-6746.
© 2001 John Carroll All rights reserved. |